🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.